|
Guidelines for Assessing Disaster Preparedness in the Health Sector
3. Health disaster preparedness program
For a comprehensive and practical approach, it is advisable to
assess the health disaster preparedness program in terms of the following
technical components:
3.1 Coordination activities 3.2 Planning and
technical programs 3.3 Training activities and research 3.4 Resources and
logistical
support
3.1 Coordination Activities
Assessment of this component measures the health disaster
preparedness program's working relationship and coordination with key
authorities and institutions. The assessment should be carried out to define
the:
· Level of coordination with technical
departments or units within the Ministry of Health; · Level of
coordination with other health sector entities; · Level of coordination
with other sectors.
Key indicators/questions:
· Is there effective participation of other
technical units in disaster preparedness activities?
· Which institutions are currently participating in disaster
preparedness activities together with the health sector?
· Is there a mutual understanding or agreement with other
health institutions?
· What is the relationship and level of commitment with
Civil Defense, Ministry of Communications, Ministry of Housing, and other key
institutions that play an important role in emergency situations?
· Are there provisions, current agreements, or joint
activities with the UN agencies, bilateral agencies, or NGOs?
Sources of information:
The assessment team should visit the offices of the Civil Defense,
UNDP, WHO, UNICEF, FAO, and other selected UN or bilateral agencies as well as
selected NGOs.
Summary of findings:
The summary of coordination activities should define the degree of
involvement and commitment of the agencies participating in the
interview.
3.2 Planning and technical programs
The overall assessment of this component will measure the degree
of technical development in the following areas:
3.2.1 Disaster plans - operational plans for natural,
technological, and manmade disasters 3.2.2 Mass casualty management -
prehospital and hospital disaster plans 3.2.3 Epidemiology - surveillance
mechanisms for disease control 3.2.4 Sanitation and sanitary
engineering 3.2.5 Temporary settlements - organization and
function
3.2.1 Disaster plans (operational)
The assessment of disaster plans should verify the existence of
contingency plans according to the country's vulnerability and the extent of
their application during emergency situations.
Key issues:
· Availability of disaster plans, and degree of
familiarity with these plans on the part of the health sector's human resources
· Availability of a directory of key disaster personnel at
national, regional, and local levels
· Availability of critical supplies; inventory at national,
regional or local levels
· Degree of complexity of existing plans
· Degree of community familiarization with existing plans
· Mechanism for activation of disaster plans
· Levels of authority and chain of command in the activation
process
· Public information strategy
· Mass media information procedures
· Existing mechanisms to respond to health
needs
 A devastating result of the 1985
Mexico City earthquake was the collapse of two major hospitals and serious
damage sustained by others. More than 500 ambulances were mobilized to evacuate
and relocate patients to unaffected institutions. (Photo: Vizcarra,
PAHO/WHO)
Sources of information:
Interviews should be carried out with disaster preparedness
offices of the Ministry of Health, Civil Defense and selected health
institutions. Existing plans should undergo extensive review. Some of the issues
mentioned above must be separated in accordance with the complexity of the
national disaster preparedness program.
Summary of findings:
The analysis of operational disaster plans should indicate their
practical applicability.
3.2.2 Mass casualty management
Assessment should focus on the mechanisms, strategies, or
procedures for providing emergency medical care during disaster situations. Mass
casualty management can be divided into two components:
3.2.2.1 Prehospital activities 3.2.2.2 Hospital
activities
Key issues/Check list
3.2.2.1 Prehospital activities
· Availability of an established Medical System
(EMS), and regulations for its operation
· Is the EMS controlled by state or private institutions?
· Existence of search and rescue teams. Do they also provide
medical care? At what level of complexity?
· Does the Ministry of Health control EMS activities during
emergency situations?
· Is there any understanding or identified role in
coordinating activities between the EMS and the Ministry of Health during
disaster situations?
· Basic profile of EMS personnel, academic qualifications,
training
· Degree of training for the general population
3.2.2.2 Hospital activities
· Hospital network: are hospitals organized in a
network for disaster situations?
· Hospital disaster plans: Do hospitals have disaster
preparedness plans? How current are they? What are their contingency provisions?
· Hospital organization: How do these plans address the
organization of main services? Are they operational?
· Hospital staff: Has the staff received adequate training
to face disaster situations? What is the level of motivation and staff
participation? Are staff familiar with the hospital disaster plan?
· Do the hospitals perform drills? How often?
· Hospital facilities: Have methods of construction and
maintenance been applied to reduce structural and nonstructural vulnerability in
hospitals and other health facilities?
· Do the hospitals have basic backup equipment for key
services? Are they operational?
· Emergency team: How are personnel organized for emergency
response?
· Emergency directory: Is it accessible and updated?
· Emergency communication: Inspect/inventory means of
emergency communications.
· Emergency transport: Inspect/inventory means of emergency
transport.
· Emergency medical supplies: Inspect/inventory existing
supplies.
· Safety measures: Inspect main items (i.e., fire alarms,
elevators, emergency exits, evacuation routes).
Sources of information:
Select two or three hospitals, meet with hospital authorities,
emergency services, and personnel. Visual inspection is highly advisable. Quick
review of the hospital plan is also recommended.
Summary of findings:
Analysis of mass casualty management should be oriented to qualify
the prehospital and hospital response capacity in case of a disaster.
3.2.3 Epidemiology
This component should outline the existing surveillance system for
disease control in emergency situations and the existing resources to face
potential health risks.
Key issues/Checklist
· Indicators of morbidity and mortality on
important communicable diseases
· Surveillance system: Existing information and reporting
system adapted to emergency situations. Who is in charge?
· Existence of special programs for vector control. What are
the main resources?
· Existence of laboratory support: Is there a network? How
does it work at the national, regional, and local levels?
· Technological disasters: Is there a surveillance system
for health effects caused by chemical or radiological accidents? Who is in
charge?
Sources of information:
Ministry of Health, laboratories, departments of epidemiology.
Summary of findings:
The analysis of surveillance mechanisms for disesase control
should indicate the response capacity for early detection and prompt
intervention of the existing system in emergency situations.
3.2.4 Sanitation and sanitary engineering
This component should identify the state of preparedness of the
basic sanitation services and their ability to operate under emergency
situations.
Checklist:
· Inventory of water supply and environmental
sanitation institutions participating in the national program on disaster
preparedness.
· Existence of contingency plans for disasters, staff
training and their active participation. Who is in charge? What is the level of
their authority?
· Vulnerability analysis: List of institutions carrying out
vulnerability analyses of the main water supply services.
· Resources and equipment: Existence of emergency teams and
backup equipment to be used in emergency situations. How are they
activated?
 The isolation caused by flooding
interrupts basic public health services and can lead to the long-term decline in
a population's well-being. (Photo: Vizcarra, PAHO/WHO)
Sources of information:
Water supply companies, Ministry of Health, on-site inspection of
water supply plants.
Summary of findings
These should identify the existing potential risks and response
capacity in case of disasters.
3.2.5 Temporary settlements
The assessment of this component determines the organization and
operation of facilities serving as temporary shelters and settlements, their
location, housing capacity, and the availability of basic health services.
Checklist:
· How are facilities designated to serve as
temporary shelters. How are they organized? Under whose authority? When are they
activated? Are they known to be structurally safe?
· Are existing basic services, water supply adequate?
· Are excrete control, waste disposal services operational?
· What is estimated number of persons to be housed?
· What areas are identified for temporary settlements? What
is the policy for establishing them? What type of shelters? What kind of
materials are being used? Are they temporary shelters or settlements?
· What are existing health problems in temporary
settlements?
· What is management system of the temporary settlements?
· Are health care programs available?
Sources of information:
Civil Defense, Red Cross, Ministry of Internal Affairs, on-site
inspection.
3.3 Training and research
The assessment of this area determines the national program's
capacity to develop training activities, produce and disseminate technical
material, participate in research, and promote disaster preparedness teaching in
schools of medicine, public health, and other institutions.
Key points/Check list:
· Training in the health sector. Number of
training activities per year, category of participants, type of training
activities, and resources for their implementation.
· Training in graduate and post-graduate levels. Is the
national program actively participating and collaborating with these
institutions? Is an increasing demand for cooperation? Define the number of
institutions carrying out teaching activities in the field of disaster
preparedness.
· Participation of UN agencies, Civil Defense, and NGOs in
training activities. Are they actually participating?
· Production of technical material. Does the national
program develop technical materials? Who is in charge? What type of materials?
What is the distribution?
· Field studies: Is the office of disaster preparedness
involved in field studies or operational research?
Sources of information
Information should be gathered from technical offices, office of
disaster preparedness of the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, review
of locally available
material.
3.4 Resources and logistical support
The assessment should determine the program's ability regarding:
· Staff · Budget ·
Communications · Transport · Essential supplies
Key points:
· Staff: How is the staff of the program
distributed at the national, regional and local level? Are they full-time or
part-time employees or volunteers? To what health disciplines do they belong
(e.g.: physician, sanitation engineer, health educator, etc.)?
· Budget: Is the program being supported by a regular
budget? Does this cover salaries and operational activities? What financial
provisions exist for emergency situations? Is there flexibility in budget
management?
· Communications: List of available means of
communication accessible to the disaster preparedness program (phone, fax,
telex, electronic mail, ham radio operators network, satellite
telecommunications).
· Reliability of existing communications systems:
Does the Ministry of Health have an organized and operational communications
center? What is the geographical coverage? What type of restrictions affect the
use of the communications tools?
· Mobilization: Is the program equipped to mobilize
its staff and emergency team on short notice? Who is in charge of providing
transportation in case of an emergency?
· Supplies: Identify the existence of essential
medical supplies and medicines and availability of inventory system for existing
supplies and donations.
Sources of information:
Ministry of Health, NGOs, Civil Defense, health authorities and
administrative departments, communication companies, ham radio
associations.
3.5 Final report on assessment
Based on the findings outlined in different areas, the final
report should contain an overall analysis of the state of preparedness in the
health sector and its potential for emergency response. Based on the strengths
and weaknesses identified, recommendations should be made to strengthen the
disaster preparedness and emergency response capability of the health
sector.
|